Feminism Will Always Come Second

Several people in the manosphere have commented about the sexual harassment charges against Al Gore. Personally, I find them hilarious. The whole incident, for obvious reasons, brings back memories of the Monica Lewinsky scandal.

It’s been noted by several already that Al Gore’s problem is, at least in part, that he’s not Alpha enough to pull off that kind of stunt. This is at least partially true. Consider, by contrast, Bill Clinton. His problem was never with Monica, who still won’t speak ill of the man.

However, there’s another point at which the two share an amazing similarity. After Clinton’s indiscretion, the feminists stood loud and strong at his side, as did almost all of the leftists. With Al Gore, again you find large swaths of the leftists standing by, albeit less enthusiastically. Why?

There are reports of the victim being pressured to keep quiet in order to serve that lefty holy grail, the mother of all righteousness: Environmentalism. Likewise, in the Clinton days there were those (especially leftists) who argued that we should just let it go because of all the “important work” he was doing.

My point?

Feminism will always come in second place in the political pantheon. The first place holder may change – we all know, after all, about women’s hypergamous nature. They will gravitate as a collective group toward whomever currently attracts them the most. But they will never achieve first place status. Not because men are being sexist, but because the movement will follow its collective estrogen fueled instincts toward other political movements that are “alpha” enough to make them submit. Today it’s environmentalism and the anti-war movement. Tomorrow, who knows? But feminism, as a movement, will always be second string.

They’d never be happy any other way.

Baby Game

One of the most Alpha things a man can possibly do to a woman is to impregnate her with a child that turns out to have extremely good genes (by whatever measure matters to the woman). This will leave her in a state of wanting him to do it again.

Unfortunately, this requires the man to actually have good genes by some measure. But if you can pull it off…

A quick word of explanation: I have a tested, verified IQ that’s pushing 150. I know that IQ isn’t the end-all, be-all of intelligence – but let’s just say that my actual, real life intelligence generally lives up to that score.

Our son is still very young. But he’s showing some of the earliest signs that he may be even smarter than his father. I, of course, am very pleased by this. My wife?